THE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM
A Professional Corporation

THE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM A Professional CorporationTHE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM A Professional CorporationTHE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation
Home
ZLF Areas of Expertise
ZLF Attorneys
ZLF-Client Victories
ZLF-Published Opinions
ZLF Updates & Verdicts
ZLF Investigations
ZLF Trainings

THE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM
A Professional Corporation

THE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM A Professional CorporationTHE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM A Professional CorporationTHE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation
Home
ZLF Areas of Expertise
ZLF Attorneys
ZLF-Client Victories
ZLF-Published Opinions
ZLF Updates & Verdicts
ZLF Investigations
ZLF Trainings
More
  • Home
  • ZLF Areas of Expertise
  • ZLF Attorneys
  • ZLF-Client Victories
  • ZLF-Published Opinions
  • ZLF Updates & Verdicts
  • ZLF Investigations
  • ZLF Trainings
  • Home
  • ZLF Areas of Expertise
  • ZLF Attorneys
  • ZLF-Client Victories
  • ZLF-Published Opinions
  • ZLF Updates & Verdicts
  • ZLF Investigations
  • ZLF Trainings

ZLF Published Opinions

  • ZLF's expertise includes employment appeals in state and federal appeals courts. Among over 50 matters ZLF has handled on appeal, four have resulted in published California Court of Appeal decisions:  


  • 1.  Riverside Sheriffs Association (Fauth) v. County of Riverside (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 1410: Court affirmed that, under the Peace Officer Bill of Rights Act, an officer is entitled to an appeal of “punitive action,” even if their employment termination was for medical unfitness and not misconduct.


  • 2.  Riverside Sheriffs Association (Sanchez) v. County of Riverside (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 20: Court affirmed that a deputy sheriff is entitled to a disciplinary appeal of an employment termination, even when the termination was for medical unfitness and not misconduct.


  • 3.  Towner v. County of Ventura (2021) 62 Cal.App.5th 761: Court clarified that a public employer must bring a Pitchess motion to compel disclosure of a peace officer personnel records, even in the context of ongoing litigation over the officer’s termination for dishonesty.


  • 4. SEIU v City of Santa Barbara (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 656: Appellate Court affirmed employees’ right to call a second election to rescind a recent vote in favor of agency shop mandatory dues even for non-union members. 


Files coming soon.

THE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM, APC

Huntington Beach, CA

213-814-5550

Copyright © 2025 THE ZAPPIA LAW FIRM, A Professional Corporation - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept